Buckley

Buckley v. De Jong CA4/1

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaAugust 7, 2013D059316California4,844 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 8/7/13 Buckley v. De Jong CA4/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION ONE

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

JAMES BUCKLEY, D059316

Plaintiff and Respondent,

v. (Super. Ct. No. 37-2009-00092288-

CU-BC-NC)

ARIE DE JONG,

Defendant and Appellant.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Diego County, David G.

Brown, Judge. Reversed.

Niddrie, Fish & Addams, David A. Niddrie; White and Bright, Leigh A. Rayner

and Randolph W. Ortlieb for Defendant and Appellant.

Law Offices of Neal A. Markowitz, Neal A. Markowitz; Lepine Law Group, Amy

J. Lepine, Charles L. Pratt and Sara A. Simmons for Plaintiff and Respondent.

In this breach of contract case, we reverse the $2.8 million verdict entered in favor

of the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.