United States v. Richard Young

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 7, 201311-10649California1,682 words

Opinion

Opinion

FILED

NOT FOR PUBLICATION AUG 07 2013

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 11-10649

Plaintiff - Appellee, D.C. No. 3:08-cr-00120-LRH-

VPC-

v.

RICHARD YOUNG, Attorney, AKA MEMORANDUM* Ricky Young,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Nevada Larry R. Hicks, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted July 10, 2013 San Francisco, California

Before: FERNANDEZ, PAEZ, and BERZON, Circuit Judges.

Defendant-Appellant Richard Young (“Young”) appeals his convictions on

several counts. He also challenges five sentencing enhancements applied by the

district court. We affirm Young’s convictions and sentence.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. 1. The government’s evidence at trial did not constructively amend Young’s

Second Superseding Indictment. The challenged evidence regarding Global One’s

loan agreement repayments was not “distinctly…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.