P.
P. v. Santiago CA4/2
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaAugust 7, 2013E054312California9,763 words
Opinion
Opinion
Filed 8/7/13 P. v. Santiago CA4/
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS
California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION TWO
THE PEOPLE,
Plaintiff and Respondent, E054312
v. (Super.Ct.No. SWF028233)
RICARDO SANTIAGO et al., OPINION
Defendants and Appellants.
APPEAL from the Superior Court of Riverside County. Mark Mandio, Judge.
Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Gary V. Crooks, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and
Appellant Ricardo Santiago.
Robert Booher, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and
Appellant Andrew Rudy Salas.