Sexton
Sexton v. Apple Studios LLC
Opinion
Opinion
Wiley, J.
Filed 3/28/
CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION EIGHT
BRENT SEXTON, B333481
Plaintiff and Respondent, Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. 23STCV11417 v.
APPLE STUDIOS LLC,
Defendant and Appellant.
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Michael P. Linfield, Judge. Reversed and remanded. Mitchell Silberberg & Knupp , Emma Luevano, Stephen A. Rossi and Rebecca Benyamin for Defendant and Appellant. JW Howard/Attorneys, John W. Howard and Scott J. Street for Plaintiff and Respondent. ____________________ During the COVID-19 pandemic, Apple Studios LLC offered Brent Sexton a film role on the condition he get vaccinated. Sexton refused vaccination and sued Apple when it withdrew its offer and cast a different actor. The trial court erroneously denied Apple’s anti-SLAPP motion. Apple’s casting was conduct in furtherance of free speech in connection with two public issues: a prominent entertainment company (1) voted with its feet in the vaccination controversy and (2) decided how to portray an enigmatic figure in American history. On the merits, Apple’s…