Rosenow

Rosenow v. Facebook, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaMarch 28, 20253:19-cv-01297California13,523 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 CARSTEN ROSENOW, Case No.: 19-cv-1297-WQH-MMP

Plaintiff,

ORDER

v. FACEBOOK, INC.; and YAHOO,

INC.,

14 Defendants. 15 HAYES, Judge: The matters before the Court are the Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s Second Amended Complaint (ECF No. 90) filed by Defendant Yahoo Holdings, Inc.1 (“Yahoo”) and the Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s Second Amended Complaint (ECF No. 91) filed by Defendant Meta Platforms, Inc. (“Facebook”).2 I. BACKGROUND A. The Criminal Case On July 19, 2017, an information was filed charging Plaintiff Carsten Rosenow (“Rosenow”) with one count of travel with intent to engage in illicit sexual conduct in 25 26 1 Yahoo Holdings, Inc. was formerly known as Oath Holdings, Inc. and erroneously sued as Yahoo, Inc. 28 violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2423(b). United States v. Rosenow, S.D. Cal. Case No. 3:17-cr- 01937-WQH, ECF No. 20. On October 19, 2017, a three-count indictment was filed charging Rosenow with one count of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.