In Re: Da Vinci Surgical Robot Antitrust Litigation

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMarch 28, 20253:21-cv-03825California4,480 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 IN RE: DA VINCI SURGICAL ROBOT Case No. 21-cv-03825-AMO

ANTITRUST LITIGATION

OMNIBUS SEALING ORDER

9 Re: Dkt. No. 330 10

12 Before the Court are several Administrative Motions to Seal. The Court, having carefully considered the submissions, the record, the applicable law, and any arguments related thereto, hereby GRANTS the Administrative Motions. LEGAL STANDARD Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 79-5, the party seeking to file a document or portions of it under seal must explain “(i) the legitimate private or public interests that warrant sealing; (ii) the injury that will result if sealing is denied; and (iii) why a less restrictive alternative to sealing is not sufficient.” Civil L.R. 79-5(c)(1). The request must be “narrowly tailored to seal only the sealable material.” Id. at 79-5(c)(3). A party seeking to seal records must provide “compelling reasons” to overcome the “strong presumption in favor of access.” Kamakana v. City & Cty. Of Honolulu, 447 F.3d…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.