PARTIDA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 DIEGO PARTIDA, Case No. 22-cv-09192-AMO Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’

v. MOTION TO DISMISS SCHENKER INC., et al., Re: Dkt. No. 55 Defendants. 11 12 Before the Court is Defendants’ motion to dismiss Plaintiff Diego Partida’s second amended complaint. The motion is fully briefed and because it is suitable for decision without oral argument, see Civ. L. R. 7-6, the Court vacated the hearing. ECF 67. This Order assumes familiarity with the facts of the case, the relevant legal standards, and this Court’s March 29, 2024 Order dismissing the first amended complaint (“FAC”). ECF 50 (“Order”). Having read the papers filed by the parties and carefully considered the arguments therein, as well as the relevant legal authority, the Court hereby GRANTS the motion to dismiss for the following reasons. I. DISCUSSION Plaintiff Diego Partida brings this putative class action under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974…