Black v. City of San Diego

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaMarch 28, 20253:21-cv-01990California9,579 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 LANCE BLACK, Case No.: 21-cv-01990-RBM-JLB

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING IN PART

v. PLAINTIFF LANCE BLACK’S

MOTION TO COMPEL

CITY OF SAN DIEGO, et al.,

SUPPLEMENTAL RESPONSES TO

Defendants. DISCOVERY

16 [ECF No. 109] 17 Before the Court is a motion to compel filed by Plaintiff Lance Black (“Plaintiff”). (ECF No. 109.) Plaintiff moves the court to compel the City of San Diego (the “City”) and Officers Ryan Poole, Elizabeth Ortiz, Christina Berg, Amy Buell, Jardin Killinger, Austin Fowler, Kyle Valente, Jonathan Wells, Katherine Jennings, Diego Usma, Jose Rodriguez, and David Burns (collectively, “Police Officer Defendants”) (collectively, “Defendants”) to provide or to supplement their responses to Requests for Production (“RFP”) Nos. 18, 19, 22, 26, 33–37, 71–73, and 75–76, propounded to the City; Interrogatory No. 3 propounded to the City; and Requests for Admission (“RFA”) Nos.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.