Riaz

Riaz v. Henry

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 28, 20251:21-cv-00911California2,047 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SAMREEN RIAZ No. 1:21-cv-00911-KES-SKO Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND

DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ JOINT

v. MOTION IN LIMINE AS TO PLAINTIFF’S

EXPERT DR. JULIE ARMSTRONG

NATHAN HENRY, et al., Doc. 54 Defendants. 16 This is a civil rights and state tort action concerning defendants’ detention of plaintiff Samreen Riaz on August 12, 2020, pursuant to California Welfare & Institutions Code § 5150. This action is set for trial on plaintiff’s claims for: (1) unlawful seizure, detention, and confinement under the Fourth Amendment, in violation of 42 U.S.C. § 1983, against defendants Henry, Canto, Alvarez, and Ceballos; (2 and 3) Monell liability under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against defendants City of Visalia and County of Tulare; and (4) negligence, (5) false arrest, (6) battery, and (7) intentional infliction of emotional distress against defendants Henry, Canto, and Alvarez. The Court held oral argument on…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.