Hill

Hill v. Workday, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMarch 28, 20253:23-cv-06558California13,291 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 7 ANTHONY C. HILL, Case No. 23-cv-06558-PHK

Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING-IN-PART AND

DENY-IN-PART DEFENDANT

v. WORKDAY, INC.’S MOTION TO

DISMISS PLAINTIFF ANTHONY C.

WORKDAY, INC., et al., HILL’S FIRST AMENDED

COMPLAINT

Defendants. Re: Dkt. 58

Now before the Court is Defendant Workday, Inc.’s (“Workday”) Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff Anthony C. Hill’s First Amended Complaint (“FAC”). [Dkt. 58]. After carefully considering the Parties’ briefing, all relevant documents, and oral argument of counsel presented at the hearing on this motion, the Court DENIES-IN-PART and GRANTS-IN-PART Defendant Workday’s Motion to Dismiss the First Amended Complaint. BACKGROUND I. FACTUAL BACKGROUND The following factual summary is based on the facts alleged by Plaintiff Hill, as detailed in his First Amended Complaint, except…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.