Hill
Hill v. Workday, Inc.
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMarch 28, 20253:23-cv-06558California13,291 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 7 ANTHONY C. HILL, Case No. 23-cv-06558-PHK
Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING-IN-PART AND
DENY-IN-PART DEFENDANT
v. WORKDAY, INC.’S MOTION TO
DISMISS PLAINTIFF ANTHONY C.
WORKDAY, INC., et al., HILL’S FIRST AMENDED
COMPLAINT
Defendants. Re: Dkt. 58
Now before the Court is Defendant Workday, Inc.’s (“Workday”) Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff Anthony C. Hill’s First Amended Complaint (“FAC”). [Dkt. 58]. After carefully considering the Parties’ briefing, all relevant documents, and oral argument of counsel presented at the hearing on this motion, the Court DENIES-IN-PART and GRANTS-IN-PART Defendant Workday’s Motion to Dismiss the First Amended Complaint. BACKGROUND I. FACTUAL BACKGROUND The following factual summary is based on the facts alleged by Plaintiff Hill, as detailed in his First Amended Complaint, except…