Rodriguez

Rodriguez v. Kijakazi

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaMarch 28, 20253:23-cv-02096California3,804 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 PATRICIA R., Case No.: 3:23-cv-02096-VET

Plaintiff,

ORDER REGARDING JOINT

v. MOTION FOR JUDICIAL REVIEW

LELAND DUDEK, Acting Commissioner of the Social Security Administration, [Doc. No. 16] 15 Defendant. 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25

27 Partially redacted in compliance with Civil Local Rule 7.1(e)(6)(b). I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff seeks review of Defendant Commissioner’s denial of her application for disability insurance benefits and supplemental security income. Doc. No. 1. Before the Court is the parties’ Joint Motion for Judicial Review of Final Decision of the Commissioner of Social Security. Doc. No. 16 (“Joint Motion”). Therein, Plaintiff seeks resolution of the following issues: (1) whether the Administrative Law Judge (“ALJ”) properly evaluated Plaintiff’s testimony; and (2) whether the ALJ properly considered Plaintiff’s asthmatic flareups in evaluating her residual functional capacity (“RFC”). Id.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.