R.C.

R.C. v. Sussex Publishers, LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMarch 28, 20253:24-cv-02609California6,651 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 R.C., et al., Case No. 24-cv-02609-JSC

Plaintiffs,

ORDER RE: DEFENDANT’S MOTION

v. TO DISMISS PLAINTIFFS’ SECOND

AMENDED COMPLAINT

SUSSEX PUBLISHERS, LLC, Re: Dkt. No. 42 Defendant.

12 Plaintiffs R.C. and D.G. (collectively “Plaintiffs”) bring this putative class action against Sussex Publishers, LLC claiming it disclosed and mishandled their private and medical information in violation of California law. (Dkt. No. 36.) Defendant now moves to dismiss the Second Amended Complaint (“SAC”) on the grounds Plaintiffs lack standing and have not stated a plausible claim. (Dkt. No. 42.) After carefully considering the parties’ written submissions, and having had the benefit of oral argument on February 27, 2024, the Court GRANTS in part and DENIES in part Defendant’s motion. BACKGROUND I. SAC Allegations Defendant owns the website ww.psychologytoday.com (the “website” or the “site”) which …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.