Aaron Mendelsohn v. Alvin Bragg
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
O
2 3 4 5 6
United States District Court Central District of California
11 AARON MENDELSOHN, Case № 2:24-cv-07420-ODW (JPRx)
Plaintiff,
ORDER GRANTING
v.
DEFENDANT’S
14 ALVIN BRAGG, MOTION TO DISMISS AND DENYING DEFENDANT’S EX Defendant.
PARTE APPLICATION [26] [43]
16 I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff Aaron Mendelsohn brings this action against Defendant Alvin Bragg, 19 in his official capacity as the District Attorney of New York County, New York 20 (“DANY”), asserting one cause of action for declaratory relief. (Compl. ¶¶ 44–48, 21 ECF No. 1.) DANY moves to dismiss Mendelsohn’s claims under Federal Rules of 22 Civil Procedure (“Rule” or “Rules”) 12(b)(1), 12(b)(6), and 12(b)(7). (Mot. Dismiss 23 (“Motion” or “Mot.”), ECF No. 26.) For the reasons below, the Court GRANTS the 24 Motion. Consequently, the Court DENIES DANY’s Ex Parte to Stay Discovery as 25 moot. (Ex Parte Appl., ECF No. 43.) 26
28 1 Having carefully considered the papers filed in connection with the Motion, the…