Elizabeth Munoz v. Nippon Express U.S.A., Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaMarch 28, 20252:24-cv-11033California2,216 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

JS-6 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ELIZABETH MUNOZ, Case No. 2:24-cv-11033-FLA (AGRx)

Plaintiff,

ORDER REMANDING ACTION FOR

v. LACK OF SUBJECT MATTER

JURISDICTION [DKT. 8]

NIPPON EXPRESS U.S.A., INC., et al., Defendants.

17 RULING On November 20, 2024, Plaintiff Elizabeth Munoz (“Plaintiff”) filed a Complaint in the Los Angeles County Superior Court, asserting claims against Defendant Nippon Express U.S.A., Inc. (“Defendant”) for, inter alia, wrongful termination and violations of the California Fair Housing and Employment Act (“FEHA”), Cal. Gov. Code § 12940, et seq. Dkt. 1-1. On December 23, 2024, Defendant removed the action to this court on the basis of diversity jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1332. Dkt. 1 (“NOR”). On January 7, 2025, the court ordered the parties to show cause why the action should not be remanded for lack…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.