Ehrlich

Ehrlich v. Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMarch 28, 20254:20-cv-02284California3,652 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 STEVEN EHRLICH, Case No. 20-cv-02284-JST

Plaintiff,

ORDER REGARDING REMEDY FOR

v. CLAIM FOR BENEFITS

HARTFORD LIFE AND ACCIDENT Re: ECF No. 83 INSURANCE COMPANY, et al., 12 Defendants.

On August 8, 2024, the Court found, in relevant part, that Defendants Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company and Aetna Life Insurance Company abused their discretion in terminating Plaintiff Steven Ehrlich’s long-term disability benefits (“LTD benefits”) as of June 28, 2019, and granted Plaintiff’s motion for judgment under Rule 52 on his claim for LTD benefits.1 See ECF No. 78. The Court declined to order a remedy at that time because the parties had not briefed that issue. See id. at 54–55. The Court ordered the parties to meet and confer regarding the appropriate remedy for Plaintiff’s claim for benefits and to submit either a stipulation or a joint brief setting forth their respective positions. See id. Now before the Court is the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.