Scoggins

Scoggins v. Falcon Court

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 28, 20251:24-cv-00188California1,318 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 DANELL R. SCOGGINS, Case No. 1:24-cv-00188-KES-SKO

Plaintiffs, ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS IN PART,

v. DISMISSING 13 (Doc. 9)

FALCON COURT, TURNING POINT OF

CENTRAL CALIFORNIA,

Defendants.

16 17 Plaintiff Danell Scoggins proceeds pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil action which she initiated on February 9, 2024. Docs. 1, 2. This matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On May 8, 2024, the assigned magistrate judge screened plaintiff’s complaint and the magistrate judge construed the allegations in the complaint to assert an Eighth Amendment claim and claims of disability discrimination and retaliation under the Fair Housing Act. Doc. 7. The magistrate judge found that the complaint failed to allege sufficient facts to make out those claims and granted plaintiff an opportunity to amend her complaint. Doc. 7. Plaintiff…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.