Dayal

Dayal v. County of Kern

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 28, 20251:24-cv-00039California2,160 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 NISHI DAYAL, Case No. 1:24-cv-00039-JLT-CDB

Plaintiff, ORDER RE REQUEST FOR RESOLUTION v. OF DISCOVERY DISPUTES

COUNTY OF KERN, et al., (Doc. 41)

Defendants.

16 Currently before the Court is a discovery dispute that the parties have agreed to submit to the Court for adjudication through the Court’s informal discovery dispute procedure. Background On June 5, 2024, the Court adopted the case management dates proposed by the parties, including a nonexpert discovery deadline of December 9, 2024, and entered the operative scheduling order, which admonished: “The dates set in this Order are considered to be firm and will not be modified absent a showing of good cause even if the request to modify is made by stipulation.” (Doc. 24) (emphasis removed). Approximately four weeks prior to the nonexpert discovery deadline, the parties filed a stipulated request for approximate 60-day extension of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.