Shirley

(PC) Brenner v. Shirley

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 28, 20251:24-cv-00545California429 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ZACHARY WILL BRENNER, Case No.: 1:24-cv-000545-KES-SKO Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS TO DISMISS

v. CERTAIN CLAIMS

HEATHER SHIRLEY, et al., Doc. 12 Defendants.

16 Plaintiff Zachary Will Brenner is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This matter was referred to a United States magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. Plaintiff initiated this action on May 8, 2024. Doc. 1. After the assigned magistrate judge screened the complaint, and prior to the magistrate judge’s issuance of the findings and recommendations, plaintiff filed a response to the screening order indicating that he did not wish to file an amended complaint and wanted to proceed on only his Eighth Amendment claims. Doc. 10. The magistrate judge then issued findings and recommendations recommending the action proceed only on…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.