Swetala

Swetala v. Quten Research Institute, LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 28, 20251:24-cv-00620California6,346 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ANTHONY SWETALA, individually and Case No. 1:24-cv-00620-JLT-BAM on behalf of all others similarly situated and the general public, Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND

DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT’S

v. MOTION TO DISMISS QUTEN RESEARCH INSTITUTE, LLC, (Doc. 20) Defendant. 17 I. INTRODUCTION Before the Court is Quten Research Institute, LLC’s motion to dismiss Anthony Swetala’s complaint. (Doc. 20.) For the reasons set forth below, Defendant’s motion to dismiss is granted in part and denied in part. II. BACKGROUND Defendant makes, distributes, sells, and markets a wide variety of dietary supplements under the brand name Qunol. (Doc. 1, ¶ 1.) In January 2023, Plaintiff purchased Defendant’s Qunol Extra Strength Tumeric 1000mg supplement. (Id., ¶ 22.) Plaintiff relied on the front label, which led Plaintiff to believe that each capsule of the product contained the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.