Banerjee
(PC) Wilson v. Banerjee
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DAVID W. WILSON, Case No. 1:25-cv-00344-HBK (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER TO RANDOMLY ASSIGN CASE TO
A DISTRICT JUDGE
v.
FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO
ANU BANFERJEE, X-CHIEF EXECU. DENY PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO OFFICER, et. al., PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS UNDER 28 U.S.C. § 1915 (g)1 Defendants. FOURTEEN-DAY OBJECTION PERIOD (Doc. No. 2) 18 Plaintiff David W. Wilson, a state prisoner currently confined at the California Substance Abuse Treatment Facility (“SATF”), operated by the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (“CDCR”), initiated this action by filing a pro se civil rights complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 on March 24, 2025. (Doc. No. 1, “Complaint”). On the same day, Plaintiff filed an application to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”). (Doc. No. 2). The undersigned recommends the district court deny Plaintiff’s IFP…