Monterrosa
Monterrosa v. City of Vallejo
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 NEFTALI MONTERROSA, et al., No. 2:20-cv-01563-DAD-SCR Plaintiffs, v. ORDER DENYING REQUEST TO SEAL CITY OF VALLEJO, et al., (Doc. No. 113) Defendants. 16 On December 6, 2024, plaintiffs filed a notice of their request to seal unspecified “documents with corresponding bates stamps Nos. COV000050–000067 and COV000068– 000096.” (Doc. No. 113.) Plaintiffs do not describe these documents in any way in their request to seal. (See id.) Defendants Jarrett Tonn and City of Vallejo filed notices of non-opposition to plaintiffs’ request to seal on the docket on December 20, 2024 and December 26, 2024, respectively. (Doc. Nos. 115, 116.) In its notice of non-opposition, defendant City of Vallejo describes the documents as “peace officer personnel records made confidential under California Penal Code § 832.7(a).” (Doc. No. 116 at 1.) For the reasons explained below, the court will deny plaintiffs’ request to seal. …