Scott

(PC) Snowden v. Scott

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 28, 20252:22-cv-01444California721 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CURTIS SNOWDEN, III, No. 2:22-cv-1444 DJC SCR P Plaintiff, v. ORDER A. SCOTT, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a former state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff proceeds with claims under the Eighth Amendment against defendants Scott, Jones, and Yang. (See ECF No. 5.) A motion to compel discovery responses filed by certain defendants is before the court. The court will grant that motion. DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO COMPEL On January 10, 2025, defendants Scott and Jones filed a motion to compel plaintiff’s responses to defendant Jones’s interrogatories, and defendant Scott’s requests for production. (ECF No. 46.) Defendants Scott and Jones claim plaintiff failed to provide any responses to their discovery requests, even after they attempted to meet and confer with plaintiff by letter. (Id.; Declaration of J.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.