Ricolcol

Argelia Reyes-Zamudio v. Ricolcol

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaMarch 3, 20255:24-cv-01705California1,043 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

1 O

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10 ARGELIA REYES-ZAMUDIO, ) Case No. 5:24-cv-01705-CAS-GJS ) ) Petitioner, ) ORDER DISMISSING CASE FOR ) ) MOOTNESS v. ) )

) ELISEO RICOLCOL, Warden, ) ) ) Respondent. ) 17 18 I. INTRODUCTION Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (dkt. 1), all documents filed and lodged in this action, the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge (dkt. 15, “Report”), and Petitioner’s Objections to the Report (dkt. 17). Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b), the Court has conducted a de novo review of those portions of the Report to which objections have been stated. Having completed its review, the Court finds that Petitioner’s / / / claims have been mooted by her release from custody on December 5, 2024, warranting dismissal of this action. II. BACKGROUND …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.