Mitchell v. San Antonio Creek LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 28, 20252:23-cv-02467California708 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 LEAH MITCHELL, an individual, No. 2:23-cv-02467-TLN-DB JENNICA TREZONA, an individual, and ELIZABETH CASTILLO, an individual Plaintiffs, AMENDED ORDER v. SAN ANTONIO CREEK LLC, a corporation, DANIEL TULIPANI, an individual, Defendants. 18 19 This matter is before the Court on Motions to Withdraw filed by Law Offices of Thomas 20 F. Nowland, counsel for Defendants San Antonio Creek LLC and Daniel Tulipani 21 (“Defendants”). (ECF Nos. 15, 16.) Plaintiffs did not file an opposition. For the reasons set 22 forth below, the Court GRANTS the motions. 23 The Local Rules of this district require an attorney who would withdraw and leave his or 24 her client without representation to obtain leave of court upon a noticed motion. E.D. Cal. L.R. 25 182(d). Local Rule 182(d) also requires an attorney to provide notice to the client and all other 26 parties who have appeared, and an affidavit stating the current or last known address of the client. 27 Id. Finally, to comply…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.