(PC) Rayburn v. California Highway Patrol

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 28, 20252:24-cv-02704California382 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JESSE JAMES RAYBURN, No. 24-cv-02704 SCR P Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

CALIFORNIA HIGHWAY PATROL, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a county prisoner in the state of Arkansas proceeding pro se in this civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. By order filed February 6, 2025, the court found plaintiff’s first amended complaint did not state any claim for relief and granted thirty days leave to file an amended complaint. (ECF No. 6.) The order advised that if Plaintiff does not file a second amended complaint within 30 days, the court will issue Findings and Recommendations that the action be dismissed for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. (Id. at 6.) The time granted for that purpose has expired, and plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint, or otherwise responded to the court’s order. ///// ///// ///// ///// ] Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.