Lorigan

(PC) Hanka v. Lorigan

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 28, 20252:25-cv-00564California684 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RYAN J. HANKA, No. 2:25-cv-0564 DAD CKD P Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND MATHEW LORIGAN, et al., FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a Sacramento County Jail prisoner proceeding pro se and seeking relief pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On February 28, 2025, plaintiff’s complaint was dismissed with leave to amend. Plaintiff has now filed an amended complaint. The court is required to screen complaints brought by prisoners seeking relief against a governmental entity or officer or employee of a governmental entity. 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a). The court must dismiss a complaint or portion thereof if the prisoner has raised claims that are legally “frivolous or malicious,” that fail to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, or that seek monetary relief from a defendant who is immune from such relief. 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(1),(2). Having conducted the required screening, the court finds…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.