Hackbart

Hackbart v. Uppal CA4/1

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaAugust 8, 2013D059657California13,279 words

Opinion

Opinion

Rourke, J.

Filed 8/8/13 Hackbart v. Uppal CA4/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION ONE

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

DAVID HACKBART et al., D059657

Plaintiffs and Appellants,

v. (Super. Ct. No. GIN057896)

SATINDER M. UPPAL et al.,

Defendants and Appellants;

BHAVNA R. UPPAL,

Defendant and Respondent.

APPEALS from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Diego County, Thomas

P. Nugent and Earl H. Maas III, Judges. Affirmed in part, reversed in part.

English & Gloven, Donald A. English, Jeffrey E. Flynn; Boudreau Williams, Jon

R. Williams, for Plaintiffs and Appellants, David Hackbart and Kihack Management,

LLC.

Catanese & Wells, Thomas Randolph Catanese, Douglas R. Hume; Gerald N.

Shelley, for Defendant and Appellant, Satinder M. Uppal…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.