Robert Newell v. Gavin Newsom

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 31, 202523-55611California573 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 31 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ROBERT H. NEWELL, No. 23-55611

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:20-cv-08935-FLA-JEM v.

GAVIN NEWSOM, in his official capacity MEMORANDUM* as Governor of the State of California; ROB BONTA, in his official capacity as Attorney General of the State of California,

Defendants-Appellees,

and

JACKIE LACEY, in her official capacity as the District Attorney of Los Angeles County,

Defendant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Fernando L. Aenlle-Rocha, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted March 31, 2025** San Francisco, California

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Before: FRIEDLAND, BENNETT, and BADE, Circuit Judges.

Plaintiff-Appellant Robert Newell appeals the district court’s order…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.