Bondi

Rojas Sac v. Bondi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 31, 202523-2310California545 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 31 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

OSCAR SANTIAGO ROJAS SAC, No. 23-2310 Agency No. Petitioner, A071-579-889

v. MEMORANDUM*

PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted March 26, 2025** Pasadena, California

Before: BOGGS***, FRIEDLAND, and BRESS, Circuit Judges.

Petitioner Oscar Santiago Rojas Sac, a native and citizen of Guatemala,

seeks review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) affirming

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable Danny J. Boggs, United States Circuit Judge for the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, sitting by designation. an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) denial of Petitioner’s application for…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.