Castrejon-Telles

Castrejon-Telles v. Bondi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 31, 202523-3851California1,038 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 31 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

RIGOBERTO CASTREJON-TELLES, No. 22-1749 Agency No. Petitioner, A037-441-199 v. MEMORANDUM*

PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,

Respondent.

RIGOBERTO CASTREJON-TELLES, No. 23-3851 Petitioner, Agency No.

A037-441-199

v.

PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted March 26, 2025** Pasadena, California

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Before: BOGGS***, FRIEDLAND, and BRESS, Circuit Judges.

Petitioner Castrejon-Telles, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for

review of two orders by the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”). In one order,

the BIA dismissed…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.