Wimbley
Wimbley v. O'Malley
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 7 D.W., Case No. 23-cv-06189-PHK
Plaintiff,
ORDER REMANDING CASE
v.
LELAND DUDECK, Acting Commissioner of Social Security,2 12 Defendant. 13 Plaintiff D.W. (“Plaintiff”) brings this action under the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) (“the Act”), seeking judicial review of a final decision by the Acting Commissioner of the Social Security Administration, Defendant Leland Dudeck (“Commissioner”), denying his applications for disability insurance benefits and supplemental security income. [Dkt. 1]. The Parties have consented to proceed before a Magistrate Judge for all purposes, including the entry of final judgment, under 28 U.S.C. § 636(c). [Dkt. 6; Dkt. 7]. Plaintiff has filed an Opening Brief, the Commissioner has filed a Response Brief, and Plaintiff has filed a Reply Brief. [Dkt. 16; Dkt. 18; Dkt. 20]. The Commissioner has also filed the Administrative Record. [Dkt. 8; Dkt. 13].