Navarro

(PC) Lear v. Navarro

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 31, 20251:21-cv-00600California899 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RODERICK WILLIAM LEAR, No. 1:21-cv-00600-KES-BAM (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS AND GRANTING

v. DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY

JUDGMENT

NAVARRO, et al., Docs. 65, 106 Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action proceeds on plaintiff’s first amended complaint against defendants Navarro, Neve, and Allison for excessive force in violation of the Eighth Amendment, arising from an incident on January 4, 2020. Doc. 47. The matter was referred to a United States magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On August 28, 2024, the assigned magistrate judge issued findings and recommendations recommending that defendants’ motion for summary judgment be granted. Doc. 106. The findings and recommendations were served on the parties and contained notice that…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.