Brooks

Brooks v. Greystar Real Estate Partners, LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaMarch 31, 20253:23-cv-01729California2,695 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RONNIE BROOKS, et al., Case No.: 23cv1729-LL-VET

Plaintiffs,

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S

v. MOTION TO CERTIFY JULY 19, 2024 ORDER FOR GREYSTAR REAL ESTATE

INTERLOCUTORY APPEAL

PARTNERS, LLC, GREYSTAR

15 CALIFORNIA INC., et al., [ECF No. 45] 16 Defendants. 17 18 Before the Court is a Motion to Certify the July 19, 2024 Order for Interlocutory Appeal (“Motion”) filed by Plaintiff Philip McGill (“Plaintiff”). ECF No. 45 (“Mot.”). Defendants Greystar California, Inc. and Greystar Real Estate Partners, LLC (collectively “Greystar” or “Defendants”) filed an Opposition to the Motion [ECF No. 46 (“Oppo.”)] and Plaintiff filed a Reply [ECF No. 47 (“Reply”)]. The Court finds this matter suitable for determination on the papers and without oral argument pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 78(b) and Civil Local Rule 7.1.d.1. Upon review of the parties’ submissions and the applicable law, the Court DENIES the Motion. / / / / / / 1…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.