P.

P. v. Kratt CA4/1

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaAugust 9, 2013D063019California135 words

Opinion

Mcintyre, J.

DISCUSSION

Appointed appellate counsel filed a brief summarizing the facts and

proceedings below. She presented no argument for reversal, but asked this court

to review the record for error as mandated by People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d

436 (Wende). Under Anders v. California (1967) 386 U.S. 738 (Anders), counsel

listed as possible but not arguable issues, whether the trial court erred in not

determining Kratt's ability to pay the drug program fee and the criminal justice

administration fee.

We granted Kratt permission to file a brief on his own behalf. He has not

responded. Our review of the record pursuant to Wende, including the possible

issues listed by counsel pursuant to Anders, has disclosed no reasonably arguable

issues on appeal. Competent counsel has represented Kratt on this appeal.

2

DISPOSITION

The judgment is affirmed.

MCINTYRE, J.

WE CONCUR:

HALLER, Acting P. J.

O'ROURKE, J.

3