Colvin

Camacho De Arreola v. Colvin

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMarch 31, 20253:24-cv-04997California4,419 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 ROSELIA A., Case No. 3:24-cv-04997-JSC

Plaintiff,

ORDER REVERSING IN PART AND

v. REMANDING FOR FURTHER

PROCEEDINGS

LELAND DUDEK, Acting Commissioner, Re: Dkt. Nos. 8, 12 Defendant.

12 Plaintiff seeks social security benefits for a combination of physical impairments including degenerative disc disease, osteoarthrosis of bilateral knees, obesity, hypertension, type II diabetes mellitus, mild anemia, mild obstructive sleep apnea, and adrenal insufficiency. (Administrative Record (“AR”) 95-96, 442.) Pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), Plaintiff filed this lawsuit for judicial review of the final decision by the Commissioner of Social Security denying her benefits claim. After careful consideration of the parties’ briefing, the Court concludes oral argument is unnecessary, see N.D. Cal. Civ. L.R. 7-1(b), REVERSES the ALJ’s decision in part and REMANDS for further proceedings. Substantial evidence does not support the ALJ’s findings as …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.