Rudas

(PC) Serrano v. Rudas

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 31, 20251:22-cv-00950California1,464 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ANDRES MASQUEDA SERRANO, Case No.: 1:22-cv-00950-KES-CDB Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S EX

PARTE APPLICATION TO STRIKE

v. PLAINTIFF’S SUR-REPLY

ROBERT RUDAS, et al., (Doc. 49)

Defendants.

16 Plaintiff Andres Masqueda Serrano is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. I. RELEVANT BACKGROUND On November 19, 2024, Defendant filed a motion for partial summary judgment based on Plaintiff’s failure to exhaust administrative remedies. (Doc. 39.) Defendant’s motion included a Rand1 warning (Doc. 39-3), specifically addressing the requirements concerning an opposition to a motion for summary judgment. When more than 21 days passed without a response from Plaintiff, the Court issued its Order to Show Cause (OSC) Why Sanctions Should Not be Imposed for Plaintiff’s Failure to File an Opposition or Statement of Non-Opposition. (Doc. 42.)…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.