Vieth

(PC) Moten v. Vieth

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 31, 20251:24-cv-00068California618 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SHARROD MOTEN, Case No. 1:24-cv-00068-KES-CDB (PC)

Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS TO DENY

v. PLAINTIFF’S APPLICATION TO PROCEED

IN FORMA PAUPERIS

VIETH, et al. Docs. 2, 7, 10 15 Defendants. 16 17 18 Sharrod Moten seeks to proceed in forma pauperis in this action, asserting that defendants are liable for violations of his civil rights. Docs. 1, 2. This matter was referred to a United States magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. In the findings and recommendations to deny plaintiff’s application to proceed in forma pauperis, the assigned magistrate judge found plaintiff subject to the three-strikes bar of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g), identifying the following cases: 1. Moten v. Calderon, No. 2:23-cv-02595-DOC-SP (C.D. Cal.) (dismissed for failure to state a claim on May 31, 2023, appeal denied on January 10, 2024); 2. Moten v. Phiefer, No. 2:23-cv-06355-DOC-SP…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.