Smith v. Chase Bank

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 31, 20251:25-cv-00330California3,222 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 CANDACE SMITH, Case No. 1:25-cv-00330-SKO

Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION

TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE

v. A CLAIM AND LACK OF

JURISDICTION

12 (Doc. 1) CHASE BANK, et al., 21-DAY DEADLINE Defendants. Clerk to Assign District Judge

16 I. INTRODUCTION A. Background On March 18, 2025, Plaintiff Candace Smith, proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, filed a civil action. (Doc. 1.) Plaintiff’s complaint is now before the Court for screening. The undersigned finds that Plaintiff has not stated a cognizable claim or a basis for federal jurisdiction and will recommend that this action be dismissed without prejudice and without leave to amend for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted and lack of jurisdiction. B. Screening Requirement and Standard In cases where the plaintiff is proceeding in forma pauperis, the Court is required to screen each…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.