Allen

Allen v. O'malley

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMarch 31, 20255:23-cv-06703California5,838 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 K.A., Case No. 23-cv-06703-VKD

Plaintiff,

ORDER RE SOCIAL SECURITY

v. APPEAL

LELAND DUDEK, Re: Dkt. Nos. 16, 20, 23 Defendant.

13 Plaintiff K.A.1 challenges a final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security (“Commissioner”)2 denying his application for supplemental security income (“SSI”) under Title XVI of the Social Security Act (“Act”), 42 U.S.C. § 1381, et seq. K.A. contends that the administrative law judge (“ALJ”) failed to adequately develop the record, erred in evaluating the medical opinion evidence, and improperly discounted K.A.’s subjective statements regarding his symptoms. As a result, K.A. argues that the ALJ’s residual functional capacity (“RFC”) assessment is not supported by substantial evidence. The Commissioner maintains that the ALJ properly evaluated the evidence and that substantial evidence supports his conclusion that K.A. is …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.