Stiles

Stiles v. O'Malley

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMarch 31, 20255:24-cv-00592California7,211 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 L.S., Case No. 24-cv-00592-VKD

Plaintiff,

ORDER RE SOCIAL SECURITY

v. APPEAL

LELAND DUDEK, et al., Re: Dkt. Nos. 11, 13 Defendants.

13 Plaintiff L.S.1 appeals a final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security (“Commissioner”)2 denying her applications for disability insurance benefits and supplemental security income under Titles II and XVI of the Social Security Act (“Act”), 42 U.S.C. §§ 423, 1381, et seq. L.S. contends that the administrative law judge (“ALJ”) failed to provide legally sufficient reasons for rejecting her subjective testimony regarding her limitations, and did not properly evaluate the opinion of consulting physician, M. Jakubowski, Psy.D. L.S. seeks “remand for the correction of the legal errors” as well as payment of benefits based on the ALJ’s evaluation of Dr. Jakubowski’s opinion. Dkt. No. 11. The Commissioner argues that the ALJ’s…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.