Cueva

(HC) (DP) Espinoza v. Cueva

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 31, 20252:94-cv-01665California3,008 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ANTONIO ESPINOZA, No. 2:94-cv-1665-KJM-SCR Petitioner, v. ORDER AND DANIEL E. CUEVA, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Respondent. 16 Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding through counsel with a petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §2254. These proceedings have been referred to the magistrate judge in accordance with Local Rule 302 and 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Petitioner filed this case when he was condemned to death by execution. He has since been resentenced to life without the possibility of parole on account of his long-standing mental disorders. Pending before the court is petitioner’s counsel’s motion to determine incompetency and for the appointment of a guardian ad litem. ECF No. 309. For the reasons explained in further detail below, the undersigned recommends granting the motion and appointing petitioner a guardian ad litem for all further proceedings in this court. …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.