Chandra

(PC) Garcia v. Chandra

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 31, 20252:22-cv-01221California1,678 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RUBEN DARIO GARCIA, JR.,

Plaintiff, No. 2:22-cv-01221-TLN-CSK

13 v. ORDER

A. CHANDRA, et al.,

15 Defendants.

17 This matter is before the Court on pro se Plaintiff Ruben Dario Garcia, Jr.’s (“Plaintiff”) Motion for Reconsideration of the assigned magistrate judge’s January 14, 2025 order. (ECF No. 51.) No opposition has been filed. For the reasons set forth below, the Court DENIES Plaintiff’s motion. /// /// /// /// /// /// 28 I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND The Court need not recount the background facts here as they are set forth in the Court’s January 25, 2025 Order. (ECF No. 50.) On December 9, 2024, Plaintiff filed a motion for appointment of counsel. (ECF No. 42.) On December 11, 2024, Plaintiff filed a request for a deposition transcript. (ECF No. 43.) On January 14, 2025, the magistrate judge denied Plaintiff’s motion and request. (ECF No. 47.) Plaintiff now seeks reconsideration of the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.