Sarieddine

Sarieddine v. Connected Int'l Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 31, 20252:22-cv-02168California2,588 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

No. 2:22-cv-02168-DJC-AC

MIKE SARIEDDINE,

12 Plaintiff, ORDER v. 14 CONNECTED INTERNATIONAL INC., et al.,

Defendants.

17 CONNECTED INTERNATIONAL INC., et

al., Counterclaimants, 19 v. 20 MIKE SARIEDDINE, et al., 21 Counterdefendants. 22 23 Plaintiff, who sells nicotine-related products under the trademark ALIEN VAPE and other related marks, has brought this trademark infringement action against Defendants, who sell cannabis-related products under ALIENLABS and other related marks, alleging there is a likelihood of confusion between the marks. Plaintiff previously moved for a preliminary injunction to enjoin Defendants’ use of their marks, which the Court denied. Plaintiff appealed that denial, and now seeks a stay in this

Court pending the Ninth Circuit’s review, arguing the Ninth Circuit’s decision will

provide helpful guidance for the Parties and this Court on central issues in this case

…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.