Hunter

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CURTIS DANE SANDERS, No. 2:23-CV-0293-TLN-DMC Plaintiff, v. ORDER MICHELLE HUNTER, Defendant. 16 Plaintiff Curtis Dane Sanders (“Plaintiff”), proceeding pro se, brings this civil action under the Americans with Disabilities Act and the California Unruh Act. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(21). On January 24, 2025, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations which were served on the parties, and which contained notice that the parties may file objections within fourteen (14) days. No objections have been filed. The Court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See Robbins v. Carey, 481 F.3d 1143, 1147 (9th Cir. 2007) (“[D]eterminations of law by the magistrate judge are reviewed de novo by both the district…