Jones

Jones v. City of Sacramento

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 31, 20252:24-cv-00145California713 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SILAS JONES, No. 2:24-cv-00145-DC-SCR Plaintiff, v. ORDER DISMISSING THIS ACTION DUE

TO PLAINTIFF’S FAILURE TO COMPLY

CITY OF SACRAMENTO, WITH COURT ORDERS AND FAILURE TO

PROSECUTE

Defendants.

16 On February 28, 2025, the court issued an order directing Plaintiff to show cause, within seven days, “why this action should not be dismissed due to Plaintiff’s failure to prosecute and failure to comply with a court order.” (Doc. No. 10.) Plaintiff’s deadline to respond to that order has now passed, and Plaintiff has not filed a response or a request for an extension of time in which to do so. In light of Plaintiff’s failure to timely respond to the order to show cause, failure to serve the defendants named in the corrected complaint filed on January 16, 2024 (Doc. No. 4), and failure to file a status report regarding scheduling as required by the court’s order issued on November 11, 2024 (Doc. No. 14),…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.