(PS) Ali v. San Francisco Asylum Office

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 31, 20252:24-cv-00654California671 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MOHAMEDSALEEM MUBARAK ALI No. 2:24-cv-0654 DJC AC PS and PARVEEN BANU MOHAMMED BABU, Plaintiffs, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS v. SAN FRANCISCO ASYLUM OFFICE and UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICE, Defendants.

19 Plaintiffs are proceeding in this action pro se. The action was accordingly referred to the undersigned for pretrial matters by E.D. Cal. R. (“Local Rule”) 302(c)(21). This case was filed on February 28, 2024. The court granted plaintiffs’ motion to proceed with IFP status and, on May 20, 2024, directed plaintiffs to submit service documents to the court within 15 days. ECF No. 3. Plaintiffs did not initially submit their service documents and on August 22, 2024, the undersigned issued an Order to Show Cause why the case should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute. ECF No. 6. Plaintiffs responded (ECF No. 7) and submitted service documents (ECF No. 9, 11). However, on February 2, 2025, the summons to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.