Macomber

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 WILLIAM NYLE NIBLE, No. 2:24-cv-01259-DJC-CSK Plaintiff, ORDER v. (ECF No. 48.) JEFF MACOMBER, et al., Defendants. 16 This matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On January 27, 2025, the Magistrate Judge filed findings and recommendations (ECF No. 48), which were served on the parties and which contained notice that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen (14) days. On February 13, 2025, Plaintiff filed late objections to the findings and recommendations. (ECF Nos. 52, 53.) On January 20, 2025, Defendant Raskin-Li filed a reply to Plaintiff’s objections. (ECF No. 57.) These filings have been considered by the Court. This Court reviews de novo those portions of the proposed findings of fact to which an objection has been made. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Commodore…