Koubong

(PC) Taylor v. Koubong

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 31, 20252:24-cv-01871California976 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 WAYNE TAYLOR, No. 2:24-cv-1871-TLN-CSK P Plaintiff, v. ORDER S. KOUBONG, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff Wayne Taylor (“Plaintiff”), a state prisoner proceeding pro se, filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On August 27, 2024, the magistrate judge dismissed Plaintiff’s second amended complaint (“SAC”) with thirty days leave to file a third amended complaint (“TAC”). (ECF No. 18.) On December 30, 2024, the magistrate judge granted plaintiff a final extension of fourteen days to file a TAC. (ECF No. 29.) Fourteen days passed and Plaintiff did not file a TAC. Accordingly, on January 27, 2025, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein recommending that this action be dismissed based on Plaintiff’s failure to file a TAC. (ECF No. 31.) As…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.