(PS) Chiu v. The President of US
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 TAIFUSIN CHIU, No. 2:25-cv-0407-TLN-SCR Plaintiff, v. ORDER THE PRESIDENT OF THE US, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff Taifusin Chiu (“Plaintiff”), proceeding pro se, filed the above-entitled action which was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(21). On February 7, 2025, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations, which were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen (14) days. (ECF No. 3.) This deadline has passed, and Plaintiff has not filed objections to the findings and recommendations. The Court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See Robbins v. Carey, 481 F.3d 1143, 1147 (9th Cir. 2007) (“[D]eterminations of law…