Bondi

Mejia Lopez v. Bondi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 1, 202523-3655California726 words

Opinion

Opinion

FILED

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

APR 1 2025

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

CARLOS DURID MEJIA LOPEZ; No. 23-3655

I.D.M.U.,

Agency Nos. Petitioners, A220-307-527

A220-307-528

v.

PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General, MEMORANDUM*

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted March 27, 2025** Pasadena, California

Before: TASHIMA, NGUYEN, and MENDOZA, Circuit Judges.

Carlos Durid Mejia Lopez and his minor son, natives and citizens of

Honduras, petition for review of a decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals

(BIA). The BIA dismissed Petitioners’ appeal of a decision of the Immigration

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2)(C). Judge (IJ), who denied their application for asylum, withholding of removal, and

protection under the Convention Against Torture (CAT). We have…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.